Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975

The appeal process for national security decisions has fundamentally changed with the replacement of the AAT by the new Administrative Review Tribunal, altering the legal risk profile for challenging adverse findings. Separately, a key compliance burden for temporary residents has been removed. They no longer face a strict 3-month deadline to sell their main residence after moving out, significantly reducing the risk of financial penalties and forced sales.

Executive summary of update

This update to the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 introduces several key changes, primarily through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Fairer for Families and Farmers and Other Measures) Act 2024 and the Administrative Review Tribunal (Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1) Act 2024. The most significant change is the replacement of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) with the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for reviewing decisions, which impacts the appeal process for national security risk assessments. Additionally, the amendments clarify and refine the application of exemption certificates for foreign persons acquiring residential land, particularly concerning new and established dwellings. The update also includes minor technical corrections and updates to cross-references, ensuring consistency with other Commonwealth legislation.

Impacted parties

This update primarily affects foreign investors, legal and compliance teams involved in foreign investment applications, and government bodies responsible for administering the foreign investment framework, including the Treasurer and the Australian Taxation Office.

Change Analysis

1. Transition from Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)

The legislation has been updated to replace all references to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) with the new Administrative Review Tribunal (ART). This is a significant structural change in the administrative law landscape.

  • Section 4 (Definitions): The definition of “AAT Act” has been replaced with “ART Act”, now referring to the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.
  • Section 130A (ART review of decisions): This section, which previously allowed for AAT review of certain decisions, has been amended to refer to the Tribunal (now defined as the ART). The process for applying for a review of a national security risk decision remains, but the forum has changed.
  • Section 130M (Costs): This section, which deals with the awarding of costs in review proceedings, has been updated to reference the ART Act.
  • Sections 130B to 130K and 130N: These sections, which detailed specific procedures and powers related to the AAT’s review process, have been repealed. The new framework relies on the provisions of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.

Implication: All new applications for review of relevant decisions under this Act will now be directed to the Administrative Review Tribunal. Legal and compliance teams must familiarise themselves with the procedures and rules of the new ART.

2. Amendments to Exemption Certificates for Residential Land

The update introduces changes to the conditions and application processes for exemption certificates related to residential land, affecting both developers and individual foreign investors.

  • Section 57 (Exemption certificates for new dwellings): The reference to “manner and form approved by the Treasurer” has been removed, aligning the application process with the general requirements of Section 135.
  • Section 58 (Exemption certificates for foreign persons): Similar to Section 57, the specific reference to the application manner and form has been removed, deferring to Section 135.
  • Section 59 (Exemption certificates for established dwellings): This section has also been amended to remove specific application requirements, now governed by Section 135.
  • Section 95 (Acquisition of interests in established dwellings): A key change is the removal of the requirement for a temporary resident to dispose of their main residence within 3 months of it ceasing to be their main residence. This provides more flexibility for temporary residents managing their property assets.

Implication: The process for applying for exemption certificates is now streamlined under a single provision (Section 135). The removal of the strict 3-month disposal rule for temporary residents offers significant relief and reduces the risk of penalties for those who may need more time to sell a property.

3. Clarification of Notice Requirements and Application Procedures

The update refines the process for submitting notices and applications, aiming for greater clarity and consistency.

  • Section 81 (Compulsory notice of notifiable actions): The reference to the “manner and form approved by the Treasurer” has been replaced with a more general reference to the requirements of Section 135.
  • Section 135 (Manner and form for notices and applications): This section has been amended to clarify that notices and applications are of no effect unless they comply with the manner and form approved by the Secretary. It also introduces a provision allowing the Secretary to accept a notice or application that “substantially complies” with the requirements, providing a degree of flexibility.

Implication: This change centralises the authority for determining the format of applications and notices with the Secretary, potentially simplifying the process for applicants. The introduction of a “substantial compliance” provision may reduce the risk of applications being rejected on minor technicalities.

Corrective and preventive actions

  • Legal Team:
    • Section 4, 130A, 130M: Update all internal documentation, templates, and training materials to replace references to the “Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT)” with the “Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)”.
    • Section 130A: Review and understand the new procedures for seeking a review of a national security risk decision under the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.
    • Section 95: Update advice provided to temporary resident clients regarding their obligations when they cease to occupy an established dwelling as their main residence, noting the removal of the 3-month disposal requirement.
    • Section 135: Ensure all future applications and notices are prepared in the manner and form approved by the Secretary, and advise clients on the new “substantial compliance” provision.
  • Compliance Team:
    • Section 135: Update internal compliance checklists and procedures to reflect the new requirements for submitting notices and applications as approved by the Secretary.
    • Section 95: Review current monitoring processes for temporary residents holding property to ensure they are no longer being tracked against the now-repealed 3-month disposal rule.
  • Operations Team:
    • Section 57, 58, 59: For teams assisting clients with applications for exemption certificates, ensure they are aware of the updated application process under Section 135 and use the latest approved forms.

Risks & opportunities assessment

Risks:

  • The transition to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) may initially cause some uncertainty regarding procedures and precedents until the new tribunal’s practices are well-established.
  • Failure to adhere to the new application and notice requirements under the updated Section 135 could result in applications being deemed ineffective, causing delays and potential compliance breaches.

Opportunities:

  • The removal of the strict 3-month disposal requirement for temporary residents under Section 95 provides greater flexibility and reduces the risk of inadvertent non-compliance, making Australia a more attractive destination for skilled migrants and temporary workers.
  • The introduction of a “substantial compliance” provision in Section 135 could reduce the administrative burden and costs associated with minor errors in applications, streamlining the approval process for investors.

Preview · The full analysis covers thematic interpretation, the complete impacted-parties register, operational and commercial risk triggers, and every claim cited to live legislation.

See the full revision analysis

Start a free 4-week trial of the Renewables digest — every regulatory change in your sector, with full analysis like the one above.

No card required · auto-downgrades to free summaries after 4 weeks

Already a client? Log in · Prefer a walkthrough? Book a demo

Related analyses

Commonwealth

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

New environmental standards and approval processes will significantly impact project planning and compliance from 20 February 2026, introducing formal reconsideration pathways and clear benchmarks for environmental outcomes. This necessitates a review of project strategies to align with enhanced regulatory clarity and compliance benchmarks.

Commonwealth

Corporations Regulations 2001

Executive summary of update This legislative update (Compilation No. 210) introduces critical exemptions to the definition of derivatives to accommodate the Australian Government’s "Help to Buy" arrangements and updates the prescribed Professional Standards Scheme for CPA Australia. The primary intent is to provide regulatory certainty for the Help to Buy shared equity program by ensuring it is not inadvertently captured by derivative regulations, while simultaneously maintaining the currency of professional liability limitation schemes for accountants. The most significant practical consequence is the de-regulation of specific government shared-equity contracts, removing compliance burdens associated with financial product regulation for these arrangements. Impacted parties This update significantly impacts financial institutions participating in the "Help to Buy" scheme and accounting professionals relying on the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme for liability limitation. Change Analysis Help to Buy Arrangements • What is the new requirement? A "Help to Buy arrangement" (as defined in the Help to Buy Act 2024) is now explicitly declared not to be a derivative for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001. • What was the old rule? The previous regulations did not contain a specific exclusion for Help to Buy arrangements, meaning such contracts could technically have been classified as derivatives under the broad definition in section 761D of the Act. • Why does this matter? This exclusion prevents the application of complex Chapter 7 obligations (such as licensing, conduct, and disclosure requirements applicable to derivatives) to the government's shared equity scheme. It simplifies the operational framework for the scheme's administration. Professional Standards Schemes (CPA Australia) • What is the new requirement? The regulations now prescribe the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme, published in the New South Wales Government Gazette No. 227 on 6 June 2025. • What was the old rule? The regulations previously referenced the CPA Australia Ltd Professional Standards (Accountants) Scheme published in August 2019 (and modified in March 2024). • Why does this matter? Prescribing the correct, current scheme is essential for ensuring that members of CPA Australia continue to benefit from the statutory caps on civil liability. Reliance on an expired or incorrect scheme reference could expose professionals to unlimited liability. Corrective and preventive actions • Regulation 7.1.04(8A): Legal and Product teams to update the internal "Financial Product Register" to classify "Help to Buy arrangements" as Exempt from derivative obligations. • Regulation 7.1.04(8A): Compliance team to ensure that any marketing or disclosure documents regarding the Help to Buy scheme do not inadvertently apply standard derivative disclosures, which may be confusing or legally inaccurate. • Regulation 7.10.02: Legal Counsel to verify that all internal references to the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme in engagement letters and liability statements are updated to cite the 6 June 2025 gazetted scheme. Risks & opportunities assessment Risks • Regulatory Misclassification: Failure to recognize the specific exclusion for Help to Buy arrangements could lead to "over-compliance," where the organization wastes resources applying derivative conduct rules to exempt products, potentially creating friction in the customer journey. • Liability Exposure: If internal risk frameworks do not update the citation for the CPA Australia scheme, there is a technical risk that reliance on the scheme could be challenged in a dispute, potentially exposing the firm or its contractors to uncapped liability. Opportunities • Operational Efficiency: The exclusion of Help to Buy arrangements from derivative regulation allows for a streamlined onboarding and management process for these products, reducing the administrative burden compared to standard financial products. • Advisory Certainty: The clear update to the CPA scheme provides immediate certainty for accounting advisors and internal finance teams regarding their liability protection status, facilitating more confident engagement in high-value advisory work.

Commonwealth

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2025

Project budgets and referral documents require immediate updates due to a complete regulatory overhaul. The new framework increases permit application fees and expands the upfront information required for projects impacting the Great Barrier Reef or water resources from coal and gas developments. New transitional provisions ensure existing permits and applications remain valid, providing legal certainty during the changeover.