Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2025

Project budgets and referral documents require immediate updates due to a complete regulatory overhaul. The new framework increases permit application fees and expands the upfront information required for projects impacting the Great Barrier Reef or water resources from coal and gas developments. New transitional provisions ensure existing permits and applications remain valid, providing legal certainty during the changeover.

Executive summary of update

This update repeals and replaces the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 with the new 2025 Regulations. While much of the content is carried over, this is a significant legislative reset that introduces several substantive changes. Key updates include new transitional provisions in Part 20 to ensure continuity for matters under the old regulations, and increased permit application fees as detailed in Schedule 11. The information required for project referrals has been expanded under Schedule 2 to explicitly include impacts on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and water resources from unconventional gas and large coal mining developments. Numerous machinery updates have been made, including changing the federal merits review body to the Administrative Review Tribunal and updating the names of government agencies and expert committees. The primary intent is to modernise the regulatory framework, with the most significant practical consequence being the need for immediate updates to internal fee schedules and referral processes.

Impacted parties

The update has a broad impact, affecting all parties involved in referring actions, applying for permits, or otherwise engaging with the environmental assessment and approvals framework under the EPBC Act.

Change Analysis

Repeal, Replacement, and New Transitional Framework

The 2025 Regulations formally repeal the 2000 Regulations via Schedule 13. To manage this transition, a new Part 20 has been introduced, providing critical legal certainty. Section 20.01 ensures that any instrument made or action taken under the old regulations (e.g., an issued permit, a submitted application) continues to have effect as if it were done under the new regulations. Section 20.02 contains specific saving provisions for fees that were payable or would have become payable under the old framework, ensuring their continued collection. Section 20.03 clarifies that historical offences under the 2000 Regulations are still considered “relevant offences” for the purpose of assessing new permit applications. This complete repeal and replacement, supported by a new transitional framework, establishes a modernised, single point of reference for the regulations.

Expanded Referral Information Requirements

Schedule 2 has been amended to broaden the scope of information required when referring a proposal to take an action. Proponents must now explicitly describe the nature and extent of likely impacts on two additional matters:

  • The environment in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Schedule 2, item 5.02(g)).
  • Water resources, specifically in relation to unconventional gas development or large coal mining development (Schedule 2, item 5.02(h)).

Correspondingly, item 5.03 now requires proponents to state whether the action is located in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. These changes increase the upfront disclosure burden for relevant projects and align the initial referral data more closely with the “water trigger” and specific protections for the Great Barrier Reef.

Administrative Modernisation and Fee Increases

The update implements widespread administrative changes to reflect the current legal and governmental landscape. Most significantly, Division 14.3 replaces all references to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal with the new Administrative Review Tribunal, aligning the regulations with the new federal merits review system. Numerous government agency names are updated in the list of bodies authorised to receive identifying information (Section 14.01H), and the name of the Independent Expert Scientific Committee has been updated to cover “Unconventional Gas Development” (Division 15.1A).

Substantively, fees for various permits under Part 1A of Schedule 11 have been increased through indexation. For example, the fee for a single permit action under item 1A.01(b) has risen from $61 to $78. The fee indexation formula in Section 18.03 has also been simplified for future annual increases.

Corrective and preventive actions

  • Legal
    • Part 20: Review the new transitional provisions to advise all business units on the continuity of existing permits, applications, and obligations.
    • General: Update all internal legal templates, advice documents, and contract clauses that reference the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 to cite the 2025 Regulations.
    • Division 14.3: Update all advice and procedures related to merits review of administrative decisions to reflect the jurisdiction of the new Administrative Review Tribunal.
  • Finance
    • Schedule 11: Immediately update all internal systems, invoices, and financial advice to reflect the new permit fee amounts.
    • Section 18.03: Implement the simplified annual indexation formula for future financial forecasting and budgeting for permit costs.
  • Operations / Project Management / Health Safety and Environment
    • Schedule 2: Update all project referral templates and internal guidance documents to ensure the mandatory inclusion of information on impacts to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and water resources for relevant projects.
    • Schedule 2: Brief all project managers and environmental assessment teams on the expanded referral information requirements to prevent incomplete submissions.
    • Section 9A.04: Update internal guidance on CITES II specimen imports to note that Bison bison athabascae (wood bison) is no longer on the specified list requiring an import permit.
  • Government & Regulatory Affairs
    • Section 14.01H: Update all stakeholder maps, contact lists, and engagement protocols to reflect the revised names of government departments and agencies.
    • Division 15.1A: Ensure all communications and submissions correctly refer to the “Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Unconventional Gas Development and Large Coal Mining Development”.

Risks & opportunities assessment

  • Risks
    • There is a significant compliance risk for projects involving unconventional gas, large coal mining, or activities in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park if referral documentation is not updated to meet the expanded requirements of Schedule 2, potentially leading to requests for further information and project delays.
    • Failure to update internal systems with the new fee schedule (Schedule 11) will result in incorrect payments, leading to administrative delays and potential rejection of permit applications.
    • Continuing to use outdated agency names or referring to the repealed 2000 Regulations in official correspondence and applications could create confusion and processing delays.
  • Opportunities
    • The repeal and replacement of the regulations provides a single, consolidated legal instrument, simplifying compliance and reducing the need to cross-reference multiple historical amendments.
    • The new transitional provisions in Part 20 offer clear legal certainty for all matters that were in progress at the time of the change, minimising legal ambiguity for ongoing projects and permits.
    • The removal of the requirement for the Secretary to approve publication notices before they are published (Section 16.03) may marginally streamline the public consultation process for proponents.

Preview · The full analysis covers thematic interpretation, the complete impacted-parties register, operational and commercial risk triggers, and every claim cited to live legislation.

See the full revision analysis

Start a free 4-week trial of the Renewables digest — every regulatory change in your sector, with full analysis like the one above.

No card required · auto-downgrades to free summaries after 4 weeks

Already a client? Log in · Prefer a walkthrough? Book a demo

Related analyses

Commonwealth

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

New environmental standards and approval processes will significantly impact project planning and compliance from 20 February 2026, introducing formal reconsideration pathways and clear benchmarks for environmental outcomes. This necessitates a review of project strategies to align with enhanced regulatory clarity and compliance benchmarks.

Commonwealth

Corporations Regulations 2001

Executive summary of update This legislative update (Compilation No. 210) introduces critical exemptions to the definition of derivatives to accommodate the Australian Government’s "Help to Buy" arrangements and updates the prescribed Professional Standards Scheme for CPA Australia. The primary intent is to provide regulatory certainty for the Help to Buy shared equity program by ensuring it is not inadvertently captured by derivative regulations, while simultaneously maintaining the currency of professional liability limitation schemes for accountants. The most significant practical consequence is the de-regulation of specific government shared-equity contracts, removing compliance burdens associated with financial product regulation for these arrangements. Impacted parties This update significantly impacts financial institutions participating in the "Help to Buy" scheme and accounting professionals relying on the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme for liability limitation. Change Analysis Help to Buy Arrangements • What is the new requirement? A "Help to Buy arrangement" (as defined in the Help to Buy Act 2024) is now explicitly declared not to be a derivative for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001. • What was the old rule? The previous regulations did not contain a specific exclusion for Help to Buy arrangements, meaning such contracts could technically have been classified as derivatives under the broad definition in section 761D of the Act. • Why does this matter? This exclusion prevents the application of complex Chapter 7 obligations (such as licensing, conduct, and disclosure requirements applicable to derivatives) to the government's shared equity scheme. It simplifies the operational framework for the scheme's administration. Professional Standards Schemes (CPA Australia) • What is the new requirement? The regulations now prescribe the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme, published in the New South Wales Government Gazette No. 227 on 6 June 2025. • What was the old rule? The regulations previously referenced the CPA Australia Ltd Professional Standards (Accountants) Scheme published in August 2019 (and modified in March 2024). • Why does this matter? Prescribing the correct, current scheme is essential for ensuring that members of CPA Australia continue to benefit from the statutory caps on civil liability. Reliance on an expired or incorrect scheme reference could expose professionals to unlimited liability. Corrective and preventive actions • Regulation 7.1.04(8A): Legal and Product teams to update the internal "Financial Product Register" to classify "Help to Buy arrangements" as Exempt from derivative obligations. • Regulation 7.1.04(8A): Compliance team to ensure that any marketing or disclosure documents regarding the Help to Buy scheme do not inadvertently apply standard derivative disclosures, which may be confusing or legally inaccurate. • Regulation 7.10.02: Legal Counsel to verify that all internal references to the CPA Australia Professional Standards Scheme in engagement letters and liability statements are updated to cite the 6 June 2025 gazetted scheme. Risks & opportunities assessment Risks • Regulatory Misclassification: Failure to recognize the specific exclusion for Help to Buy arrangements could lead to "over-compliance," where the organization wastes resources applying derivative conduct rules to exempt products, potentially creating friction in the customer journey. • Liability Exposure: If internal risk frameworks do not update the citation for the CPA Australia scheme, there is a technical risk that reliance on the scheme could be challenged in a dispute, potentially exposing the firm or its contractors to uncapped liability. Opportunities • Operational Efficiency: The exclusion of Help to Buy arrangements from derivative regulation allows for a streamlined onboarding and management process for these products, reducing the administrative burden compared to standard financial products. • Advisory Certainty: The clear update to the CPA scheme provides immediate certainty for accounting advisors and internal finance teams regarding their liability protection status, facilitating more confident engagement in high-value advisory work.

Commonwealth

Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975

The appeal process for national security decisions has fundamentally changed with the replacement of the AAT by the new Administrative Review Tribunal, altering the legal risk profile for challenging adverse findings. Separately, a key compliance burden for temporary residents has been removed. They no longer face a strict 3-month deadline to sell their main residence after moving out, significantly reducing the risk of financial penalties and forced sales.